HEAD TO HEAD · SCORED SEPTEMBER 2026 · CROWDSTRIKE EASM ADDED 13 OCTOBER 2026
CyCognito vs CrowdStrike EASM: attack surface management compared
Quick answer
CyCognito scores 7.60 to CrowdStrike EASM's 5.90 on our weights, a gap of 1.70. CyCognito leads on discovery, attribution, exploitability validation, remediation, time to value and pricing transparency; CrowdStrike EASM leads on integrations.
Scored September 2026 · CrowdStrike EASM added 13 October 2026 · Drawn from vendor product pages, docs and public pricing
How do CyCognito and CrowdStrike EASM compare on each criterion?
| Criterion | Weight | CyCognito | CrowdStrike EASM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery of unknown assets and subsidiaries | 20% | 9 | 7 | CyCognito |
| Attribution accuracy and false-positive handling | 15% | 8 | 5 | CyCognito |
| Exploitability validation | 15% | 8 | 5 | CyCognito |
| Remediation and mitigation support | 20% | 7 | 6 | CyCognito |
| Integrations and platform reach | 10% | 7 | 8 | CrowdStrike EASM |
| Time to value | 10% | 9 | 7 | CyCognito |
| Pricing transparency | 10% | 4 | 3 | CyCognito |
CyCognito leads on 6 criteria, CrowdStrike EASM on 1, 0 tied. Weighted: CyCognito 7.60, CrowdStrike EASM 5.90.
What does a finding arrive with in each?
CyCognito
- Owner or subsidiary attributedDocumented
- Exploitability provenDocumented
- Ticket or workflow createdDocumented
- Compensating control appliedNot documented
- Fix retestedDocumented
CrowdStrike EASM
- Owner or subsidiary attributedNot documented
- Exploitability provenPartial
- Ticket or workflow createdDocumented
- Compensating control appliedPartial
- Fix retestedNot documented
Where does each one win?
CyCognito wins on
Discovery of unknown assets and subsidiaries: 9 vs 7
Starts from the organization's name with no IP ranges or asset lists and covers subsidiaries, acquired-company infrastructure and third-party-connected systems.
Attribution accuracy and false-positive handling: 8 vs 5
Every finding carries a trace of how it was found, why it belongs to the organization and who owns it.
Exploitability validation: 8 vs 5
Runs more than 100,000 unauthenticated black-box security tests across more than 30 exposure categories, designed not to disrupt production.
Remediation and mitigation support: 7 vs 6
Step-by-step guidance per issue, owner-linked workflows and a retest after each fix; no automated mitigation is documented.
Time to value: 9 vs 7
The organization's name is the only required input.
Pricing transparency: 4 vs 3
Publishes its pricing basis (total asset volume for ASM; active IPs and web applications for exposure validation) and a quote form with a stated 24-hour average response; no list price.
CrowdStrike EASM wins on
Integrations and platform reach: 8 vs 7
Sits in the CrowdStrike Falcon platform beside threat intelligence, IT hygiene and vulnerability management across endpoints, cloud, network and OT/IoT; ServiceNow and Jira are the named integrations.
How do CyCognito and CrowdStrike EASM price?
| Item | CyCognito | CrowdStrike EASM |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Quote-based. Pricing basis published: total asset volume (ASM); active IPs and web applications (exposure validation). | Not published for EASM. CrowdStrike's pricing page lists endpoint bundles only (from $7.99 per device per month) and says add-ons cost extra. |
| Deployment | SaaS; unauthenticated black-box external testing | SaaS, part of CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management |
| Pricing transparency score | 4 | 3 |
Prices and pricing bases as published by each vendor and reviewed in September 2026. 'Not published' means we did not find it on the vendor's public pages.
Should you choose CyCognito or CrowdStrike EASM?
Choose CyCognito if
- Finding unknown assets, subsidiaries and acquired infrastructure is your main gap. CyCognito scores 9 on discovery: Starts from the organization's name with no IP ranges or asset lists and covers subsidiaries, acquired-company infrastructure and third-party-connected systems.
- You want results with the least setup. CyCognito scores 9 on time to value: The organization's name is the only required input.
Choose CrowdStrike EASM if
- The tool has to fit a wider security platform or many existing tools. CrowdStrike EASM scores 8 on integrations: Sits in the CrowdStrike Falcon platform beside threat intelligence, IT hygiene and vulnerability management across endpoints, cloud, network and OT/IoT; ServiceNow and Jira are the named integrations.
- Finding unknown assets, subsidiaries and acquired infrastructure is your main gap. CrowdStrike EASM scores 7 on discovery: CrowdStrike says its internet mapping technology continuously indexes the entire internet and maps known and unknown assets, including shadow IT, 24/7; the inputs needed and subsidiary coverage are not described.
On our default weights CyCognito comes out ahead. Change the weights in the score calculator to see whether that holds for your priorities.
Frequently asked questions
Is CyCognito better than CrowdStrike EASM?
On our weights CyCognito scores higher, 7.60 to 5.90. CyCognito leads on 6 criteria and CrowdStrike EASM on 1 criterion, with 0 tied. The better choice depends on which criteria matter most to you; the score calculator lets you change the weights.
What do CyCognito and CrowdStrike EASM cost?
CyCognito: Quote-based. Pricing basis published: total asset volume (ASM); active IPs and web applications (exposure validation). CrowdStrike EASM: Not published for EASM. CrowdStrike's pricing page lists endpoint bundles only (from $7.99 per device per month) and says add-ons cost extra.
Which one does more to help fix exposures?
CyCognito scores 7 on remediation and mitigation support against 6 for CrowdStrike EASM. CyCognito: Step-by-step guidance per issue, owner-linked workflows and a retest after each fix; no automated mitigation is documented.
Sources: cycognito.com, Discovery, Active security testing, Remediation acceleration, Pricing, CrowdStrike EASM, Falcon Exposure Management, Falcon Exposure Management data sheet (PDF), Pricing · Reviewed September 2026