Attack Surface Ranked

HEAD TO HEAD · SCORED SEPTEMBER 2026 · CROWDSTRIKE EASM ADDED 13 OCTOBER 2026

Hadrian vs Censys ASM: attack surface management compared

Quick answer

Hadrian scores 7.10 to Censys ASM's 5.85 on our weights, a gap of 1.25. Hadrian leads on attribution, exploitability validation, remediation, time to value and pricing transparency; Censys ASM leads on integrations. They tie on discovery.

Scored September 2026 · CrowdStrike EASM added 13 October 2026 · Drawn from vendor product pages, docs and public pricing

Hadrian

Rank 4 of 10

7.10 / 10

Best for agentic exploit validation with a published test price

Censys ASM

Rank 10 of 10

5.85 / 10

Best for internet-scan evidence and threat hunting teams

How do Hadrian and Censys ASM compare on each criterion?

Scores for Hadrian and Censys ASM on each criterion
CriterionWeightHadrianCensys ASMWinner
Discovery of unknown assets and subsidiaries20%77Tie
Attribution accuracy and false-positive handling15%76Hadrian
Exploitability validation15%95Hadrian
Remediation and mitigation support20%75Hadrian
Integrations and platform reach10%68Censys ASM
Time to value10%76Hadrian
Pricing transparency10%64Hadrian

Hadrian leads on 5 criteria, Censys ASM on 1, 1 tied. Weighted: Hadrian 7.10, Censys ASM 5.85.

What does a finding arrive with in each?

Hadrian

  • Owner or subsidiary attributedPartial
  • Exploitability provenDocumented
  • Ticket or workflow createdDocumented
  • Compensating control appliedNot documented
  • Fix retestedDocumented

Censys ASM

  • Owner or subsidiary attributedNot documented
  • Exploitability provenPartial
  • Ticket or workflow createdDocumented
  • Compensating control appliedNot documented
  • Fix retestedNot documented

Where does each one win?

Hadrian wins on

  • Attribution accuracy and false-positive handling: 7 vs 6

    Uses machine learning trained by ethical hackers to confirm asset ownership.

  • Exploitability validation: 9 vs 5

    Agentic AI simulates attacks and, by Hadrian's account, proves exploitability within 15 minutes.

  • Remediation and mitigation support: 7 vs 5

    Actionable remediation guidance, automatic ticket creation and automatic regression testing after fixes; no edge mitigation documented.

  • Time to value: 7 vs 6

    Offers a free external security report; onboarding inputs are not specified.

  • Pricing transparency: 6 vs 4

    Publishes a price for NOVA agentic penetration tests (from 1,250 euros per test excluding VAT, bundles available); ATLAS is priced by total asset count on request.

Censys ASM wins on

  • Integrations and platform reach: 8 vs 6

    Jira, ServiceNow ITSM and CMDB, Tenable VM, Google Security Operations, Microsoft Sentinel, Axonius, Brinqa, Slack, Webex, plus AWS, Google Cloud and Azure.

Tied: Discovery of unknown assets and subsidiaries (7).

How do Hadrian and Censys ASM price?

Pricing and deployment for Hadrian and Censys ASM
ItemHadrianCensys ASM
PricingNOVA agentic penetration test: from 1,250 euros per test excluding VAT, bundles available.ASM: contact sales. A free Censys platform account exists.
DeploymentSaaSSaaS
Pricing transparency score64

Prices and pricing bases as published by each vendor and reviewed in September 2026. 'Not published' means we did not find it on the vendor's public pages.

Should you choose Hadrian or Censys ASM?

Choose Hadrian if

  • You want proof that an exposure is exploitable before it reaches a ticket. Hadrian scores 9 on exploitability validation: Agentic AI simulates attacks and, by Hadrian's account, proves exploitability within 15 minutes.
  • You want help closing exposures, not only a longer list of them. Hadrian scores 7 on remediation: Actionable remediation guidance, automatic ticket creation and automatic regression testing after fixes; no edge mitigation documented.

Choose Censys ASM if

  • The tool has to fit a wider security platform or many existing tools. Censys ASM scores 8 on integrations: Jira, ServiceNow ITSM and CMDB, Tenable VM, Google Security Operations, Microsoft Sentinel, Axonius, Brinqa, Slack, Webex, plus AWS, Google Cloud and Azure.
  • Finding unknown assets, subsidiaries and acquired infrastructure is your main gap. Censys ASM scores 7 on discovery: First-party scanning across all 65K ports finds services on nonstandard ports and hosts with self-signed certificates; discovery expands from seeds the customer supplies.

On our default weights Hadrian comes out ahead. Change the weights in the score calculator to see whether that holds for your priorities.

Frequently asked questions

Is Hadrian better than Censys ASM?

On our weights Hadrian scores higher, 7.10 to 5.85. Hadrian leads on 5 criteria and Censys ASM on 1 criterion, with 1 tied. The better choice depends on which criteria matter most to you; the score calculator lets you change the weights.

What do Hadrian and Censys ASM cost?

Hadrian: NOVA agentic penetration test: from 1,250 euros per test excluding VAT, bundles available. Censys ASM: ASM: contact sales. A free Censys platform account exists.

Which one does more to help fix exposures?

Hadrian scores 7 on remediation and mitigation support against 5 for Censys ASM. Hadrian: Actionable remediation guidance, automatic ticket creation and automatic regression testing after fixes; no edge mitigation documented.