HEAD TO HEAD · SCORED SEPTEMBER 2026 · CROWDSTRIKE EASM ADDED 13 OCTOBER 2026
Hadrian vs Cortex Xpanse: attack surface management compared
Quick answer
Hadrian scores 7.10 to Cortex Xpanse's 6.80 on our weights, a gap of 0.30. Hadrian leads on exploitability validation and pricing transparency; Cortex Xpanse leads on discovery, remediation and integrations. They tie on attribution and time to value.
Scored September 2026 · CrowdStrike EASM added 13 October 2026 · Drawn from vendor product pages, docs and public pricing
How do Hadrian and Cortex Xpanse compare on each criterion?
| Criterion | Weight | Hadrian | Cortex Xpanse | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery of unknown assets and subsidiaries | 20% | 7 | 8 | Cortex Xpanse |
| Attribution accuracy and false-positive handling | 15% | 7 | 7 | Tie |
| Exploitability validation | 15% | 9 | 5 | Hadrian |
| Remediation and mitigation support | 20% | 7 | 8 | Cortex Xpanse |
| Integrations and platform reach | 10% | 6 | 9 | Cortex Xpanse |
| Time to value | 10% | 7 | 7 | Tie |
| Pricing transparency | 10% | 6 | 2 | Hadrian |
Hadrian leads on 2 criteria, Cortex Xpanse on 3, 2 tied. Weighted: Hadrian 7.10, Cortex Xpanse 6.80.
What does a finding arrive with in each?
Hadrian
- Owner or subsidiary attributedPartial
- Exploitability provenDocumented
- Ticket or workflow createdDocumented
- Compensating control appliedNot documented
- Fix retestedDocumented
Cortex Xpanse
- Owner or subsidiary attributedPartial
- Exploitability provenNot documented
- Ticket or workflow createdDocumented
- Compensating control appliedDocumented
- Fix retestedNot documented
Where does each one win?
Hadrian wins on
Exploitability validation: 9 vs 5
Agentic AI simulates attacks and, by Hadrian's account, proves exploitability within 15 minutes.
Pricing transparency: 6 vs 2
Publishes a price for NOVA agentic penetration tests (from 1,250 euros per test excluding VAT, bundles available); ATLAS is priced by total asset count on request.
Cortex Xpanse wins on
Discovery of unknown assets and subsidiaries: 8 vs 7
Palo Alto Networks says Xpanse scans the full IPv4 space several times a day (4.3 billion addresses; 500 billion+ ports scanned daily).
Remediation and mitigation support: 8 vs 7
Active Response runs built-in automated playbooks, with routing and remediation through Cortex XSOAR playbooks.
Integrations and platform reach: 9 vs 6
Native ties to Cortex XSOAR and Prisma Cloud inside the Palo Alto Networks Cortex portfolio.
Tied: Attribution accuracy and false-positive handling (7), Time to value (7).
How do Hadrian and Cortex Xpanse price?
| Item | Hadrian | Cortex Xpanse |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | NOVA agentic penetration test: from 1,250 euros per test excluding VAT, bundles available. | Not published. Contact sales. |
| Deployment | SaaS | SaaS within the Palo Alto Networks Cortex portfolio |
| Pricing transparency score | 6 | 2 |
Prices and pricing bases as published by each vendor and reviewed in September 2026. 'Not published' means we did not find it on the vendor's public pages.
Should you choose Hadrian or Cortex Xpanse?
Choose Hadrian if
- You want proof that an exposure is exploitable before it reaches a ticket. Hadrian scores 9 on exploitability validation: Agentic AI simulates attacks and, by Hadrian's account, proves exploitability within 15 minutes.
- You need every asset tied to the right entity and owner, with the evidence shown. Hadrian scores 7 on attribution: Uses machine learning trained by ethical hackers to confirm asset ownership.
Choose Cortex Xpanse if
- The tool has to fit a wider security platform or many existing tools. Cortex Xpanse scores 9 on integrations: Native ties to Cortex XSOAR and Prisma Cloud inside the Palo Alto Networks Cortex portfolio.
- Finding unknown assets, subsidiaries and acquired infrastructure is your main gap. Cortex Xpanse scores 8 on discovery: Palo Alto Networks says Xpanse scans the full IPv4 space several times a day (4.3 billion addresses; 500 billion+ ports scanned daily).
On our default weights Hadrian comes out ahead. Change the weights in the score calculator to see whether that holds for your priorities.
Frequently asked questions
Is Hadrian better than Cortex Xpanse?
On our weights Hadrian scores higher, 7.10 to 6.80. Hadrian leads on 2 criteria and Cortex Xpanse on 3 criteria, with 2 tied. The better choice depends on which criteria matter most to you; the score calculator lets you change the weights.
What do Hadrian and Cortex Xpanse cost?
Hadrian: NOVA agentic penetration test: from 1,250 euros per test excluding VAT, bundles available. Cortex Xpanse: Not published. Contact sales.
Which one does more to help fix exposures?
Cortex Xpanse scores 8 on remediation and mitigation support against 7 for Hadrian. Cortex Xpanse: Active Response runs built-in automated playbooks, with routing and remediation through Cortex XSOAR playbooks.
Sources: hadrian.io, Platform, Technology, Integrations, Pricing, Cortex Xpanse, Attack surface management, Exposure management · Reviewed September 2026